<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (8) TMI 1208 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105292</link>
    <description>Export goods cleared under bond and later returned to the factory of origin did not, on this record, require a fresh duty debit in RG 23A Part II. The return of the goods by itself was held insufficient to justify levy or debit, and the assessee could not be denied corresponding credit of the amount already debited. The duty debit was therefore treated as unwarranted, and relief followed for the assessee against the disputed debit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2012 11:31:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=142330" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (8) TMI 1208 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105292</link>
      <description>Export goods cleared under bond and later returned to the factory of origin did not, on this record, require a fresh duty debit in RG 23A Part II. The return of the goods by itself was held insufficient to justify levy or debit, and the assessee could not be denied corresponding credit of the amount already debited. The duty debit was therefore treated as unwarranted, and relief followed for the assessee against the disputed debit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105292</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>