https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105274 The appellants sought to recall a stay order directing pre-deposit, but their efforts were unsuccessful as higher courts upheld the order. Despite quantifying amounts and seeking waivers, the stay order remained unmodified, leading to the dismissal of the appeal for non-compliance. The High Court restrained enforcement of a detention order pending a hearing, emphasizing the need for quantification and due process. Ultimately, the appeal was dismissed due to failure to comply with the pre-deposit requirement, underscoring the finality of the stay order despite legal challenges. en-us Thu, 23 Aug 2001 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 05 Mar 2012 10:52:37 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105274 The appellants sought to recall a stay order directing pre-deposit, but their efforts were unsuccessful as higher courts upheld the order. Despite quantifying amounts and seeking waivers, the stay order remained unmodified, leading to the dismissal of the appeal for non-compliance. The High Court restrained enforcement of a detention order pending a hearing, emphasizing the need for quantification and due process. Ultimately, the appeal was dismissed due to failure to comply with the pre-deposit requirement, underscoring the finality of the stay order despite legal challenges. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 23 Aug 2001 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105274