<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (8) TMI 1195 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105272</link>
    <description>Imported toy kitchen sets were treated as kitchen items put up in sets rather than reduced-size models, so classification under Heading 9503.70 was sustained. On that basis, the heading attracted a specific import licence and, because no such licence was produced, confiscation for want of licence was upheld. The monetary liabilities were then assessed as excessive on the facts and circumstances, and both were reduced.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2012 10:48:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=142310" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (8) TMI 1195 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105272</link>
      <description>Imported toy kitchen sets were treated as kitchen items put up in sets rather than reduced-size models, so classification under Heading 9503.70 was sustained. On that basis, the heading attracted a specific import licence and, because no such licence was produced, confiscation for want of licence was upheld. The monetary liabilities were then assessed as excessive on the facts and circumstances, and both were reduced.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105272</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>