<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (12) TMI 526 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105249</link>
    <description>Interest under section 8(1) of the U.P. Sales Tax Act, 1948 was confined to tax &quot;admittedly payable&quot; within the prescribed time, meaning tax disclosed in the dealer&#039;s accounts or admitted in the return or proceeding. A bona fide dispute over product classification and the applicable tax rate did not amount to a failure to pay admitted tax, especially where the dealer had paid the tax on its own admitted rate and the disputed balance was paid after final resolution. The distinction from the post-assessment regime under sections 8(1-A) and 8(1-B) meant the differential amount remained disputed tax until determined, so interest under section 8(1) was not leviable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2013 13:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=142287" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (12) TMI 526 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105249</link>
      <description>Interest under section 8(1) of the U.P. Sales Tax Act, 1948 was confined to tax &quot;admittedly payable&quot; within the prescribed time, meaning tax disclosed in the dealer&#039;s accounts or admitted in the return or proceeding. A bona fide dispute over product classification and the applicable tax rate did not amount to a failure to pay admitted tax, especially where the dealer had paid the tax on its own admitted rate and the disputed balance was paid after final resolution. The distinction from the post-assessment regime under sections 8(1-A) and 8(1-B) meant the differential amount remained disputed tax until determined, so interest under section 8(1) was not leviable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105249</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>