https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105235 A special debt-recovery statute conferring exclusive jurisdiction on the Tribunal for covered bank debt claims also bars civil court jurisdiction in matters within that scheme and transfers pending suits and other proceedings to the Tribunal. An application under Order 9 Rule 13 CPC to set aside an ex parte decree was treated as an "other proceeding" because the remedy is procedural and travels with the transferred dispute. After transfer, the proper forum for such an application is the Tribunal, not the civil court. en-us Mon, 02 Aug 1999 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 03 Mar 2012 12:36:58 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105235 A special debt-recovery statute conferring exclusive jurisdiction on the Tribunal for covered bank debt claims also bars civil court jurisdiction in matters within that scheme and transfers pending suits and other proceedings to the Tribunal. An application under Order 9 Rule 13 CPC to set aside an ex parte decree was treated as an "other proceeding" because the remedy is procedural and travels with the transferred dispute. After transfer, the proper forum for such an application is the Tribunal, not the civil court. Case-Laws Companies Law Mon, 02 Aug 1999 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105235