<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (3) TMI 705 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105233</link>
    <description>Tax under Section 5E of the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act applies only where there is a transfer of the right to use goods. On the agreement read as a whole, machinery supplied for project work remained under the assessee&#039;s effective control and possession, and the contractors could not use it for other purposes or move it at will. A custody clause while the machinery was on site did not amount to transfer of the right to use. The surrounding circumstances, including prior assessment treatment of the same agreement, supported this construction. The hire charges were therefore not exigible to sales tax, and the appeal failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Mar 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Feb 2025 13:00:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=142271" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (3) TMI 705 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105233</link>
      <description>Tax under Section 5E of the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act applies only where there is a transfer of the right to use goods. On the agreement read as a whole, machinery supplied for project work remained under the assessee&#039;s effective control and possession, and the contractors could not use it for other purposes or move it at will. A custody clause while the machinery was on site did not amount to transfer of the right to use. The surrounding circumstances, including prior assessment treatment of the same agreement, supported this construction. The hire charges were therefore not exigible to sales tax, and the appeal failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT / Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Mar 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105233</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>