<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (7) TMI 586 - HIGH COURT OF MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105226</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the writ petition seeking mandamus to direct consideration for stock exchange membership. The petitioner&#039;s failure to submit a complete application form and follow proper procedures rendered him ineligible to challenge the stock exchange&#039;s recruitment process or eligibility criteria. The court held that without completing the application process, the petitioner lacked standing to seek relief through writ jurisdiction. Emphasizing adherence to prescribed procedures, the court concluded that the petitioner&#039;s non-compliance with the application process precluded any merits in his petition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Jul 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Mar 2012 11:35:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=142264" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (7) TMI 586 - HIGH COURT OF MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105226</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the writ petition seeking mandamus to direct consideration for stock exchange membership. The petitioner&#039;s failure to submit a complete application form and follow proper procedures rendered him ineligible to challenge the stock exchange&#039;s recruitment process or eligibility criteria. The court held that without completing the application process, the petitioner lacked standing to seek relief through writ jurisdiction. Emphasizing adherence to prescribed procedures, the court concluded that the petitioner&#039;s non-compliance with the application process precluded any merits in his petition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Jul 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105226</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>