https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105225 The Commission found that the complainants proved delivery of their shares and receipt of the sale price through confirmation memos. The opposite party's alleged adjustment based on a purported Finalysis Ltd. share transaction was rejected because the stock exchange record and supporting documents did not corroborate it, and the handwriting expert's opinion indicated that the signature on the delivery book was not genuine. The record also failed to show that the second opposite party had purchased the Finalysis shares for or on behalf of the first opposite party. The first opposite party was therefore held liable to pay the sale proceeds with interest and costs, while the claim against the second opposite party was rejected. en-us Thu, 15 Jul 1999 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 18 Feb 2013 16:29:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105225 The Commission found that the complainants proved delivery of their shares and receipt of the sale price through confirmation memos. The opposite party's alleged adjustment based on a purported Finalysis Ltd. share transaction was rejected because the stock exchange record and supporting documents did not corroborate it, and the handwriting expert's opinion indicated that the signature on the delivery book was not genuine. The record also failed to show that the second opposite party had purchased the Finalysis shares for or on behalf of the first opposite party. The first opposite party was therefore held liable to pay the sale proceeds with interest and costs, while the claim against the second opposite party was rejected. Case-Laws Companies Law Thu, 15 Jul 1999 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105225