https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105218 The court allowed the company to proceed with criminal proceedings under section 630 of the Companies Act, 1956, concurrently with a civil suit for possession and damages against a former employee. Emphasizing the importance of upholding section 630, the court set aside the stay order, directing prompt conclusion of the criminal proceedings. The court highlighted that the existence of a civil remedy does not preclude criminal action, enabling the company to pursue legal recourse effectively in seeking possession of the disputed flat. en-us Fri, 18 Jun 1999 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 03 Mar 2012 10:53:01 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105218 The court allowed the company to proceed with criminal proceedings under section 630 of the Companies Act, 1956, concurrently with a civil suit for possession and damages against a former employee. Emphasizing the importance of upholding section 630, the court set aside the stay order, directing prompt conclusion of the criminal proceedings. The court highlighted that the existence of a civil remedy does not preclude criminal action, enabling the company to pursue legal recourse effectively in seeking possession of the disputed flat. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 18 Jun 1999 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105218