https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105213 Section 11 appointment of an arbitrator under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 was held to have a narrow and limited scope, and the respondent's status as a sick industrial company did not bar the request. Section 22 of the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 was found inapplicable to the proceeding for appointment of an arbitrator, so the objection based on sickness protection was overruled. The Court noted that any challenge to the continuation of arbitration could still be raised in appropriate proceedings under law, and an arbitrator was appointed. en-us Fri, 14 May 1999 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 30 Aug 2013 16:19:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105213 Section 11 appointment of an arbitrator under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 was held to have a narrow and limited scope, and the respondent's status as a sick industrial company did not bar the request. Section 22 of the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 was found inapplicable to the proceeding for appointment of an arbitrator, so the objection based on sickness protection was overruled. The Court noted that any challenge to the continuation of arbitration could still be raised in appropriate proceedings under law, and an arbitrator was appointed. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 14 May 1999 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105213