<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (10) TMI 881 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105210</link>
    <description>Section 78(5) of the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, 1994 was upheld as a valid machinery provision connected to the State&#039;s power to levy and collect sales tax. The Court held that the document-carrying requirement and penalty for non-compliance, including false or forged documents, were aimed at preventing tax evasion in the check-post and inspection scheme, and bore a reasonable and proximate connection to goods in transit. The fixed penalty was treated as a permissible deterrent within legislative competence, and the availability of a hearing before imposition supported procedural fairness. The constitutional and vires challenge therefore failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2025 09:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=142248" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (10) TMI 881 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105210</link>
      <description>Section 78(5) of the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, 1994 was upheld as a valid machinery provision connected to the State&#039;s power to levy and collect sales tax. The Court held that the document-carrying requirement and penalty for non-compliance, including false or forged documents, were aimed at preventing tax evasion in the check-post and inspection scheme, and bore a reasonable and proximate connection to goods in transit. The fixed penalty was treated as a permissible deterrent within legislative competence, and the availability of a hearing before imposition supported procedural fairness. The constitutional and vires challenge therefore failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT / Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105210</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>