<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (9) TMI 926 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105199</link>
    <description>A governmental subsidy paid under an administrative retention price scheme, including the equated freight subsidy, was held to be outside taxable turnover because sales tax applies only to the aggregate amount payable by the purchaser for the goods. The statutory price fixed under the Fertiliser (Control) Order, 1985 was the only sale consideration, and the subsidy was not paid under the sale contract or by or on behalf of the purchaser. Amounts received independently of the contract of sale and from a source other than the purchaser cannot be treated as part of sale price or turnover; the subsidies were therefore not liable to sales tax.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2025 21:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=142237" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (9) TMI 926 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105199</link>
      <description>A governmental subsidy paid under an administrative retention price scheme, including the equated freight subsidy, was held to be outside taxable turnover because sales tax applies only to the aggregate amount payable by the purchaser for the goods. The statutory price fixed under the Fertiliser (Control) Order, 1985 was the only sale consideration, and the subsidy was not paid under the sale contract or by or on behalf of the purchaser. Amounts received independently of the contract of sale and from a source other than the purchaser cannot be treated as part of sale price or turnover; the subsidies were therefore not liable to sales tax.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT / Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105199</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>