https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105196 Pendency of conciliation proceedings under the Industrial Disputes Act does not bar a court from entertaining proceedings under section 630(2) of the Companies Act for wrongful withholding of a company quarter after termination of employment. Section 33 of the Industrial Disputes Act restricts alteration of service conditions during specified industrial dispute proceedings, but continued occupation of accommodation allotted through service after dismissal is a consequence of cessation of employment, not an alteration of service conditions. Section 630 provides a penal remedy and authorises delivery up of company property, so later conciliation does not suspend or oust the court's jurisdiction. en-us Wed, 31 Mar 1999 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 02 Mar 2012 18:19:27 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105196 Pendency of conciliation proceedings under the Industrial Disputes Act does not bar a court from entertaining proceedings under section 630(2) of the Companies Act for wrongful withholding of a company quarter after termination of employment. Section 33 of the Industrial Disputes Act restricts alteration of service conditions during specified industrial dispute proceedings, but continued occupation of accommodation allotted through service after dismissal is a consequence of cessation of employment, not an alteration of service conditions. Section 630 provides a penal remedy and authorises delivery up of company property, so later conciliation does not suspend or oust the court's jurisdiction. Case-Laws Companies Law Wed, 31 Mar 1999 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105196