<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (8) TMI 1147 - CEGAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105193</link>
    <description>A penalty imposed for short landing was found unsustainable because the order gave no specific reasons for fastening an equivalent penalty and was not a speaking order. The penalty issue was therefore remanded to the adjudicating authority for fresh consideration, with a direction to pass a reasoned order and give the party an opportunity of hearing before any fresh adjudication on penalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2012 18:02:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=142231" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (8) TMI 1147 - CEGAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105193</link>
      <description>A penalty imposed for short landing was found unsustainable because the order gave no specific reasons for fastening an equivalent penalty and was not a speaking order. The penalty issue was therefore remanded to the adjudicating authority for fresh consideration, with a direction to pass a reasoned order and give the party an opportunity of hearing before any fresh adjudication on penalty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105193</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>