<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (3) TMI 987 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105192</link>
    <description>The revisional power under section 40 of the Haryana General Sales Tax Act, 1973 read with section 9(2) of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 permits the Commissioner to call for the record of an assessment and examine its legality or propriety. The provision is not restricted merely because the original assessment followed the law as then understood, or because revision is triggered by a later judicial view on the correct tax rate. A notice issued on that statutory basis is valid if it discloses the ground for action and satisfies the conditions precedent. On that reasoning, the revisional authority had jurisdiction to issue notice on the tax treatment of surgical cotton.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2013 16:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=142230" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (3) TMI 987 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105192</link>
      <description>The revisional power under section 40 of the Haryana General Sales Tax Act, 1973 read with section 9(2) of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 permits the Commissioner to call for the record of an assessment and examine its legality or propriety. The provision is not restricted merely because the original assessment followed the law as then understood, or because revision is triggered by a later judicial view on the correct tax rate. A notice issued on that statutory basis is valid if it discloses the ground for action and satisfies the conditions precedent. On that reasoning, the revisional authority had jurisdiction to issue notice on the tax treatment of surgical cotton.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105192</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>