<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (3) TMI 541 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105191</link>
    <description>The court granted the petition for winding up the company based on loss of substratum and just and equitable grounds, as the company had ceased its main objective activities and the petitioners had a prima facie case for winding up. However, the court rejected the appointment of the Official Liquidator as provisional Liquidator due to the lack of urgency and grounds for such an appointment based on the available material.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2012 18:09:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=142229" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (3) TMI 541 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105191</link>
      <description>The court granted the petition for winding up the company based on loss of substratum and just and equitable grounds, as the company had ceased its main objective activities and the petitioners had a prima facie case for winding up. However, the court rejected the appointment of the Official Liquidator as provisional Liquidator due to the lack of urgency and grounds for such an appointment based on the available material.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105191</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>