<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (3) TMI 540 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105190</link>
    <description>The court rejected the application for a separate meeting of non-banking financial companies, concluding that the applicant does not constitute a distinct class of unsecured creditors. The court granted liberty to the applicant to raise concerns about the explanatory statement during the hearing of the scheme of amalgamation. No order as to costs. Application rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2012 18:07:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=142228" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (3) TMI 540 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105190</link>
      <description>The court rejected the application for a separate meeting of non-banking financial companies, concluding that the applicant does not constitute a distinct class of unsecured creditors. The court granted liberty to the applicant to raise concerns about the explanatory statement during the hearing of the scheme of amalgamation. No order as to costs. Application rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105190</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>