<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (3) TMI 538 - UTTAR PRADESH STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105187</link>
    <description>The State Commission dismissed the appeal against the District Consumer Forum&#039;s order, stating that the appeal did not seek relief as a consumer but aimed at remedial action against the alleged misconduct of the Forum members. The State Commission found the appeal not maintainable under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, and upheld the District Consumer Forum&#039;s order dated 9-12-1993.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2013 16:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=142225" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (3) TMI 538 - UTTAR PRADESH STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105187</link>
      <description>The State Commission dismissed the appeal against the District Consumer Forum&#039;s order, stating that the appeal did not seek relief as a consumer but aimed at remedial action against the alleged misconduct of the Forum members. The State Commission found the appeal not maintainable under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, and upheld the District Consumer Forum&#039;s order dated 9-12-1993.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105187</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>