<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (8) TMI 1140 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105183</link>
    <description>The appeal against the penalty for misdeclaration of goods under the DEEC Scheme was refused as the court found the imposed penalty of Rs. 10,000 to be insufficient considering the value of the goods. The court held that the penalty was not illegal or unjust.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2012 17:58:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=142221" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (8) TMI 1140 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105183</link>
      <description>The appeal against the penalty for misdeclaration of goods under the DEEC Scheme was refused as the court found the imposed penalty of Rs. 10,000 to be insufficient considering the value of the goods. The court held that the penalty was not illegal or unjust.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105183</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>