<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (8) TMI 1135 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105179</link>
    <description>A DTA unit converted into a 100% EOU only from the effective date fixed by the Development Commissioner, and the pre-conversion stock was verified and allowed to be cleared as DTA goods. On that basis, duty could not be demanded for the period before the conversion date, because the competent authority had already determined when EOU status took effect. The notice seeking differential excise duty on the footing that EOU status applied from an earlier date was therefore unsustainable, and there was no basis for penalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2012 17:40:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=142217" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (8) TMI 1135 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105179</link>
      <description>A DTA unit converted into a 100% EOU only from the effective date fixed by the Development Commissioner, and the pre-conversion stock was verified and allowed to be cleared as DTA goods. On that basis, duty could not be demanded for the period before the conversion date, because the competent authority had already determined when EOU status took effect. The notice seeking differential excise duty on the footing that EOU status applied from an earlier date was therefore unsustainable, and there was no basis for penalty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105179</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>