<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (8) TMI 1133 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105177</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in the case of M/s. New Allenberry Works against the Central Excise Commissioner&#039;s order confirming a demand and imposing a penalty. The Tribunal allowed adjustment of duty payment evidence against the confirmed demand but upheld the penalty imposition due to rule violations. However, considering the appellants&#039; argument about gate passes being prepared as per customer requests and actual clearance occurring with sufficient balance in the PLA, the Tribunal reduced the penalty to Rs. 1,00,000. The appeal was disposed of with the modified penalty amount, taking into account all facts and circumstances of the case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2012 17:37:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=142215" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (8) TMI 1133 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105177</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in the case of M/s. New Allenberry Works against the Central Excise Commissioner&#039;s order confirming a demand and imposing a penalty. The Tribunal allowed adjustment of duty payment evidence against the confirmed demand but upheld the penalty imposition due to rule violations. However, considering the appellants&#039; argument about gate passes being prepared as per customer requests and actual clearance occurring with sufficient balance in the PLA, the Tribunal reduced the penalty to Rs. 1,00,000. The appeal was disposed of with the modified penalty amount, taking into account all facts and circumstances of the case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105177</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>