https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105165 Service of notice was treated as substantially compliant with Rule 32 of the Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 where the notice sent to the registered address was returned with the endorsement that the company had left without address, and publication was also effected in newspapers and the Gazette. In the absence of any reply from the company, the court treated the consent terms as an acknowledgement of debt and found no credible or bona fide dispute. On that basis, breach of the consent terms justified relief, and the petition was made absolute in terms of prayers (a) and (b). en-us Wed, 24 Feb 1999 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 02 Mar 2012 17:15:52 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105165 Service of notice was treated as substantially compliant with Rule 32 of the Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 where the notice sent to the registered address was returned with the endorsement that the company had left without address, and publication was also effected in newspapers and the Gazette. In the absence of any reply from the company, the court treated the consent terms as an acknowledgement of debt and found no credible or bona fide dispute. On that basis, breach of the consent terms justified relief, and the petition was made absolute in terms of prayers (a) and (b). Case-Laws Companies Law Wed, 24 Feb 1999 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105165