<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (2) TMI 621 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105157</link>
    <description>Dishonoured cheques, valid statutory notice, and the company&#039;s failure to respond were treated as sufficient to establish an undisputed debt for winding-up relief. The petitioner proved supply of goods, issuance and dishonour of nine cheques, and service of notice at the registered office under section 434(1)(a) of the Companies Act, 1956. Service through the Company Registrar at the registered address was treated as sufficient compliance with the Company Court Rules. On that basis, the company was found to be justly indebted, and the petition was made absolute in favour of the petitioner.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2012 17:08:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=142196" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (2) TMI 621 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105157</link>
      <description>Dishonoured cheques, valid statutory notice, and the company&#039;s failure to respond were treated as sufficient to establish an undisputed debt for winding-up relief. The petitioner proved supply of goods, issuance and dishonour of nine cheques, and service of notice at the registered office under section 434(1)(a) of the Companies Act, 1956. Service through the Company Registrar at the registered address was treated as sufficient compliance with the Company Court Rules. On that basis, the company was found to be justly indebted, and the petition was made absolute in favour of the petitioner.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105157</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>