<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (1) TMI 829 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105145</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in favor of the appellants, ruling that the imported goods, described as &quot;old original synthetic hosiery rags,&quot; were permissible serviceable garments under Customs Tariff Heading 63.10. It determined that no specific import license was required for the goods, as the importers were authorized to import raw materials without one. The Tribunal also found that the misdeclaration of the goods as premutilated rags did not warrant confiscation or penalties, as there was no significant gain from the misdeclaration. Consequently, the appellants were permitted to import the serviceable garments as raw materials without duty payment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2012 16:44:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=142184" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (1) TMI 829 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105145</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in favor of the appellants, ruling that the imported goods, described as &quot;old original synthetic hosiery rags,&quot; were permissible serviceable garments under Customs Tariff Heading 63.10. It determined that no specific import license was required for the goods, as the importers were authorized to import raw materials without one. The Tribunal also found that the misdeclaration of the goods as premutilated rags did not warrant confiscation or penalties, as there was no significant gain from the misdeclaration. Consequently, the appellants were permitted to import the serviceable garments as raw materials without duty payment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105145</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>