https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105135 The Supreme Court upheld the decisions of the lower courts regarding the termination of workmen for negligence, directing their reinstatement without back wages. The Court emphasized that negligence, without proof of misappropriation, did not justify depriving employees of reinstatement. It found the Industrial Court's decisions reasonable, emphasizing the criteria for refusing reinstatement based on loss of confidence. The Court declined to interfere with the lower courts' orders, dismissing the appeals challenging the reinstatement without back wages. The jurisdiction for filing appeals against orders made in writ petitions before the High Court was clarified, with the Court emphasizing the importance of stating the jurisdiction clearly. en-us Thu, 13 Sep 2001 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 19 Jul 2014 15:24:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105135 The Supreme Court upheld the decisions of the lower courts regarding the termination of workmen for negligence, directing their reinstatement without back wages. The Court emphasized that negligence, without proof of misappropriation, did not justify depriving employees of reinstatement. It found the Industrial Court's decisions reasonable, emphasizing the criteria for refusing reinstatement based on loss of confidence. The Court declined to interfere with the lower courts' orders, dismissing the appeals challenging the reinstatement without back wages. The jurisdiction for filing appeals against orders made in writ petitions before the High Court was clarified, with the Court emphasizing the importance of stating the jurisdiction clearly. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 13 Sep 2001 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105135