<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (7) TMI 873 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105133</link>
    <description>The judge set aside the stay order and final order imposed by the Commissioner (Appeals) and allowed the appeal by remanding the case. The Commissioner (Appeals) was instructed to reassess the stay application, considering the appellants&#039; financial hardships and granting a new opportunity for a personal hearing. The appeal was to be decided on its merits after affording the party another chance, subject to the outcome of the stay application.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jul 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2012 16:20:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=142172" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (7) TMI 873 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105133</link>
      <description>The judge set aside the stay order and final order imposed by the Commissioner (Appeals) and allowed the appeal by remanding the case. The Commissioner (Appeals) was instructed to reassess the stay application, considering the appellants&#039; financial hardships and granting a new opportunity for a personal hearing. The appeal was to be decided on its merits after affording the party another chance, subject to the outcome of the stay application.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jul 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105133</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>