https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105127 The court found in favor of the petitioner in a case involving non-payment for supplied goods, a dishonored cheque, and allegations of defective goods. The court rejected the respondents' defense of defective goods, noting inconsistencies and lack of credibility. It also determined that the dishonored cheque was part payment for outstanding dues, indicating the respondents' inability to meet their debts. Consequently, the court justified a winding-up order against the respondents due to their prolonged non-payment and financial instability. The court directed the petitioners to advertise the winding-up petition and scheduled further proceedings. en-us Mon, 07 Dec 1998 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 02 Mar 2012 16:01:48 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105127 The court found in favor of the petitioner in a case involving non-payment for supplied goods, a dishonored cheque, and allegations of defective goods. The court rejected the respondents' defense of defective goods, noting inconsistencies and lack of credibility. It also determined that the dishonored cheque was part payment for outstanding dues, indicating the respondents' inability to meet their debts. Consequently, the court justified a winding-up order against the respondents due to their prolonged non-payment and financial instability. The court directed the petitioners to advertise the winding-up petition and scheduled further proceedings. Case-Laws Companies Law Mon, 07 Dec 1998 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105127