<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (9) TMI 852 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105121</link>
    <description>The appeals were allowed as the Tribunal found that the crushed clay used in manufacturing stoneware pipes was not marketable and fell under the exemption provided by Explanation III to Notification No. 175/86. The demand for duty on the crushed clay was deemed unsustainable, relieving the Appellants from duty liability.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2012 15:50:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=142160" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (9) TMI 852 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105121</link>
      <description>The appeals were allowed as the Tribunal found that the crushed clay used in manufacturing stoneware pipes was not marketable and fell under the exemption provided by Explanation III to Notification No. 175/86. The demand for duty on the crushed clay was deemed unsustainable, relieving the Appellants from duty liability.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105121</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>