<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (4) TMI 538 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105103</link>
    <description>The judgment concluded that the vessel and cargo were not liable for confiscation. Penalties imposed on the appellants were found unjustified as none had contravened the provisions of the Act. The appeals were allowed, the impugned order was set aside, and consequential reliefs were granted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2012 15:13:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=142142" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (4) TMI 538 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105103</link>
      <description>The judgment concluded that the vessel and cargo were not liable for confiscation. Penalties imposed on the appellants were found unjustified as none had contravened the provisions of the Act. The appeals were allowed, the impugned order was set aside, and consequential reliefs were granted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105103</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>