<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (7) TMI 614 - HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105100</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the winding up petition filed by a partnership concern against a respondent-company under sections 433 and 434 of the Companies Act, 1956. The petition was based on the respondent&#039;s alleged inability to pay debts arising from construction work. The court found insufficient evidence to support the debt claim, emphasized the respondent&#039;s bona fide dispute, criticized the lack of material particulars in the petition, and noted procedural flaws in serving statutory notice. Ultimately, the court ruled in favor of the respondent, dismissing the petition for failing to meet legal requirements and establish a strong case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2012 15:06:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=142139" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (7) TMI 614 - HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105100</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the winding up petition filed by a partnership concern against a respondent-company under sections 433 and 434 of the Companies Act, 1956. The petition was based on the respondent&#039;s alleged inability to pay debts arising from construction work. The court found insufficient evidence to support the debt claim, emphasized the respondent&#039;s bona fide dispute, criticized the lack of material particulars in the petition, and noted procedural flaws in serving statutory notice. Ultimately, the court ruled in favor of the respondent, dismissing the petition for failing to meet legal requirements and establish a strong case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105100</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>