<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (3) TMI 858 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105098</link>
    <description>A person who buys notified agricultural produce for processing or manufacture and later sells the resultant notified produce remains a trader for market fee purposes if the statutory definition of trader covers purchase for resale, processing, manufacture or other non-domestic use. Processing alone does not convert such a person into a producer, because producer status depends on producing the main agricultural produce on one&#039;s own account. The residuary mode of collection under section 65(2-A)(iv) applies only where no specific collection clause governs the transaction; it cannot be used when the trader-related provisions apply. The statutory scheme therefore gives primacy to the specific collection mechanism over the residuary limb.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Aug 2013 10:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=142137" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (3) TMI 858 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105098</link>
      <description>A person who buys notified agricultural produce for processing or manufacture and later sells the resultant notified produce remains a trader for market fee purposes if the statutory definition of trader covers purchase for resale, processing, manufacture or other non-domestic use. Processing alone does not convert such a person into a producer, because producer status depends on producing the main agricultural produce on one&#039;s own account. The residuary mode of collection under section 65(2-A)(iv) applies only where no specific collection clause governs the transaction; it cannot be used when the trader-related provisions apply. The statutory scheme therefore gives primacy to the specific collection mechanism over the residuary limb.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105098</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>