https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105096 Section 482 CrPC is discussed as an exceptional inherent power that cannot be used to bypass the statutory bar on a second revision under section 397(3) merely by changing the form of the proceeding. The commentary states that such jurisdiction is confined to cases of grave miscarriage of justice, abuse of process, failure of justice, or clear procedural non-compliance, and was not available on the facts described. It also explains that a complaint alleging non-compliance with debenture-related prospectus conditions under the Companies Act, 1956 disclosed a prima facie case, and objections based on locus standi or lack of jurisdiction did not justify quashing at the threshold. en-us Tue, 16 Jun 1998 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 02 Mar 2012 15:01:18 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105096 Section 482 CrPC is discussed as an exceptional inherent power that cannot be used to bypass the statutory bar on a second revision under section 397(3) merely by changing the form of the proceeding. The commentary states that such jurisdiction is confined to cases of grave miscarriage of justice, abuse of process, failure of justice, or clear procedural non-compliance, and was not available on the facts described. It also explains that a complaint alleging non-compliance with debenture-related prospectus conditions under the Companies Act, 1956 disclosed a prima facie case, and objections based on locus standi or lack of jurisdiction did not justify quashing at the threshold. Case-Laws Companies Law Tue, 16 Jun 1998 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105096