<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (6) TMI 514 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105066</link>
    <description>Export goods misdeclared in description and value were found liable to confiscation because examination of the consignments and the partner&#039;s statement showed that the goods were used, old, damaged and of lower quality than declared. The misdeclaration was treated as a bona fide lapse arising from inadequate supervision rather than a deliberate scheme, but the extent of undervaluation and the wrongful benefit that could have been obtained still justified confiscation and the imposition of fine and penalty. In view of the exporter&#039;s clean past record and business scale, the redemption fine and penalty were reduced as a matter of proportionality.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2012 13:16:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=142105" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (6) TMI 514 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105066</link>
      <description>Export goods misdeclared in description and value were found liable to confiscation because examination of the consignments and the partner&#039;s statement showed that the goods were used, old, damaged and of lower quality than declared. The misdeclaration was treated as a bona fide lapse arising from inadequate supervision rather than a deliberate scheme, but the extent of undervaluation and the wrongful benefit that could have been obtained still justified confiscation and the imposition of fine and penalty. In view of the exporter&#039;s clean past record and business scale, the redemption fine and penalty were reduced as a matter of proportionality.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105066</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>