<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (4) TMI 437 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105046</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed re-credit of the excess amount to the Bangalore unit but upheld the penalty imposed on them, reducing it to Rs. 5,000. The decision was based on the understanding that the payment of duty at 20% by the Bangalore unit was not a technical lapse but a deliberate action to facilitate credit availment, justifying the penalty imposition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2012 12:50:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=142085" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (4) TMI 437 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105046</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed re-credit of the excess amount to the Bangalore unit but upheld the penalty imposed on them, reducing it to Rs. 5,000. The decision was based on the understanding that the payment of duty at 20% by the Bangalore unit was not a technical lapse but a deliberate action to facilitate credit availment, justifying the penalty imposition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105046</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>