<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (12) TMI 751 - HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105035</link>
    <description>The Court recalled the order dated 23-9-1997 in Company Petition No. 224 of 1996 due to non-compliance with sections 391 and 394 and rule 80 of the Company Court Rules. The Company Petition No. 224 of 1996 was dismissed. The issue of whether any action should be taken against Mr. K.W. Desai and the question of costs were deferred to the next hearing. The Court observed that Mr. K.W. Desai wasted judicial time by persisting with untenable arguments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Dec 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2012 12:19:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=142074" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (12) TMI 751 - HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105035</link>
      <description>The Court recalled the order dated 23-9-1997 in Company Petition No. 224 of 1996 due to non-compliance with sections 391 and 394 and rule 80 of the Company Court Rules. The Company Petition No. 224 of 1996 was dismissed. The issue of whether any action should be taken against Mr. K.W. Desai and the question of costs were deferred to the next hearing. The Court observed that Mr. K.W. Desai wasted judicial time by persisting with untenable arguments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Dec 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105035</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>