<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (11) TMI 806 - HIGH COURT OF MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105026</link>
    <description>Section 22 of the Sick Industrial Companies Act, 1985 bars further proceedings in a suit for recovery of money against a sick industrial company while BIFR proceedings are pending, unless consent is obtained from the Board or Appellate Authority. Because the suit combined a money-recovery claim with declaratory and injunctive reliefs, the HC stayed the suit pending disposal of the BIFR proceedings. A request for an interim decree under Order XII Rule 6 CPC, said to rest on an admission in the defendant&#039;s letter, was also declined at that stage and left for consideration after the BIFR process concludes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2012 12:10:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=142065" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (11) TMI 806 - HIGH COURT OF MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105026</link>
      <description>Section 22 of the Sick Industrial Companies Act, 1985 bars further proceedings in a suit for recovery of money against a sick industrial company while BIFR proceedings are pending, unless consent is obtained from the Board or Appellate Authority. Because the suit combined a money-recovery claim with declaratory and injunctive reliefs, the HC stayed the suit pending disposal of the BIFR proceedings. A request for an interim decree under Order XII Rule 6 CPC, said to rest on an admission in the defendant&#039;s letter, was also declined at that stage and left for consideration after the BIFR process concludes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105026</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>