<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (12) TMI 664 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105017</link>
    <description>Marketability determines whether an intermediate product is excisable, rather than whether it is actually sold. Unvulcanised sandwiched fabric, produced by placing a rubber mixture between textile layers for footwear uppers, was treated by the majority as a distinct commodity capable of storage, transport and dispatch for stitching within its usable life. Short shelf life did not itself defeat marketability, and unrebutted evidence supported vendibility. Captive consumption therefore did not preclude excise liability under Chapter 59. A dissenting view considered that the Revenue had not established marketability because of the product&#039;s unvulcanised condition and limited shelf life.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Dec 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2012 11:48:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=142056" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (12) TMI 664 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105017</link>
      <description>Marketability determines whether an intermediate product is excisable, rather than whether it is actually sold. Unvulcanised sandwiched fabric, produced by placing a rubber mixture between textile layers for footwear uppers, was treated by the majority as a distinct commodity capable of storage, transport and dispatch for stitching within its usable life. Short shelf life did not itself defeat marketability, and unrebutted evidence supported vendibility. Captive consumption therefore did not preclude excise liability under Chapter 59. A dissenting view considered that the Revenue had not established marketability because of the product&#039;s unvulcanised condition and limited shelf life.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Dec 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105017</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>