<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (10) TMI 355 - SETTLEMENT COMMISSION, CUSTOMS &amp; CENTRAL EXCISE, C</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105011</link>
    <description>The Settlement Commission granted immunity from prosecution and penalties to M/s. C.S. India and co-applicants for clandestine removal of imported goods without permission, acknowledging duty liability and lack of evidence contradicting the main applicant&#039;s claims. Immunity from interest was justified based on procedural rectification and payment of due duty. Terms included total duty payable, immunity from fines, penalties, and prosecution, with a warning of immunity withdrawal for fraudulent conduct. The settlement aligned with Customs Act provisions, addressing duty liabilities, immunities, and penalties for all parties involved.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Oct 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2012 11:42:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=142050" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (10) TMI 355 - SETTLEMENT COMMISSION, CUSTOMS &amp; CENTRAL EXCISE, C</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105011</link>
      <description>The Settlement Commission granted immunity from prosecution and penalties to M/s. C.S. India and co-applicants for clandestine removal of imported goods without permission, acknowledging duty liability and lack of evidence contradicting the main applicant&#039;s claims. Immunity from interest was justified based on procedural rectification and payment of due duty. Terms included total duty payable, immunity from fines, penalties, and prosecution, with a warning of immunity withdrawal for fraudulent conduct. The settlement aligned with Customs Act provisions, addressing duty liabilities, immunities, and penalties for all parties involved.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Oct 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105011</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>