<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (9) TMI 489 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105008</link>
    <description>Rectification of a final order is permissible only for a patent mistake apparent from the existing record. Documents and case law not placed before the Tribunal when the original order was passed cannot be relied on to reopen that decision. As the invoices and annexures were outside the record considered in the final disposal, no apparent error was shown and the request for rectification was rightly rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Sep 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2012 11:39:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=142047" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (9) TMI 489 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105008</link>
      <description>Rectification of a final order is permissible only for a patent mistake apparent from the existing record. Documents and case law not placed before the Tribunal when the original order was passed cannot be relied on to reopen that decision. As the invoices and annexures were outside the record considered in the final disposal, no apparent error was shown and the request for rectification was rightly rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Sep 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105008</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>