<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (9) TMI 481 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104998</link>
    <description>Modvat credit could not be denied on unproved assumptions about the quality of HDPE granules or on a bare allegation of non-receipt of imported granules. The officers&#039; opinion that the goods were regenerated granules was unsupported by sampling or other evidence, while the recorded quantity matched the credit claimed and the assessee&#039;s explanation was not disproved. On the alleged non-receipt of imported goods, transport documents showed movement to the factory and the Revenue failed to rebut them or discharge its burden of proving non-receipt. The denial of credit and associated penalty were therefore set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Sep 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2012 11:11:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=142037" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (9) TMI 481 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104998</link>
      <description>Modvat credit could not be denied on unproved assumptions about the quality of HDPE granules or on a bare allegation of non-receipt of imported granules. The officers&#039; opinion that the goods were regenerated granules was unsupported by sampling or other evidence, while the recorded quantity matched the credit claimed and the assessee&#039;s explanation was not disproved. On the alleged non-receipt of imported goods, transport documents showed movement to the factory and the Revenue failed to rebut them or discharge its burden of proving non-receipt. The denial of credit and associated penalty were therefore set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Sep 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104998</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>