<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (10) TMI 639 - HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104971</link>
    <description>The court allowed the appeals, revoking the winding up order against the appellant company. It emphasized the importance of pending rehabilitation proposals and the involvement of secured creditors in the decision-making process. The court directed the payment of expenses to the official liquidator for watch and ward staff, to be borne by the appellant if not already paid as per the Single Judge&#039;s directions. No costs were awarded in the judgment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Oct 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2012 18:51:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=142010" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (10) TMI 639 - HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104971</link>
      <description>The court allowed the appeals, revoking the winding up order against the appellant company. It emphasized the importance of pending rehabilitation proposals and the involvement of secured creditors in the decision-making process. The court directed the payment of expenses to the official liquidator for watch and ward staff, to be borne by the appellant if not already paid as per the Single Judge&#039;s directions. No costs were awarded in the judgment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Oct 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104971</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>