<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (10) TMI 634 - HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104966</link>
    <description>A secured creditor seeking to remain outside liquidation cannot bypass the Companies Act winding-up scheme to recover mortgaged property from the Official Liquidator. The secured creditor&#039;s rights under the State Financial Corporations Act, 1951 do not override the pari passu framework under section 529A, under which workmen&#039;s dues and secured creditors&#039; claims rank together. A creditor retaining security must also bear its share of preservation expenses incurred for the asset. The Official Liquidator&#039;s custody and control over company assets after a winding-up order remains effective, and any delivery of possession must respect the competing claims of the workmen and other secured creditor.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Oct 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2012 18:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=142005" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (10) TMI 634 - HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104966</link>
      <description>A secured creditor seeking to remain outside liquidation cannot bypass the Companies Act winding-up scheme to recover mortgaged property from the Official Liquidator. The secured creditor&#039;s rights under the State Financial Corporations Act, 1951 do not override the pari passu framework under section 529A, under which workmen&#039;s dues and secured creditors&#039; claims rank together. A creditor retaining security must also bear its share of preservation expenses incurred for the asset. The Official Liquidator&#039;s custody and control over company assets after a winding-up order remains effective, and any delivery of possession must respect the competing claims of the workmen and other secured creditor.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Oct 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104966</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>