<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (8) TMI 480 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104959</link>
    <description>Refining and deodorising crude pig fat was treated as prima facie capable of amounting to manufacture because the resulting product was fit for a distinct use as textile sizing material, while the crude fat itself was impure and unsuitable for that use. At the same time, the departmental classification was found prima facie incorrect because Note 1(a) to Chapter 15 excluded pig fat, and the product was considered prima facie classifiable under Heading 05.01 as an animal-origin product not elsewhere specified, carrying nil duty. Waiver of pre-deposit of duty and penalty was therefore granted, and recovery was stayed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Aug 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2012 18:37:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=141998" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (8) TMI 480 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104959</link>
      <description>Refining and deodorising crude pig fat was treated as prima facie capable of amounting to manufacture because the resulting product was fit for a distinct use as textile sizing material, while the crude fat itself was impure and unsuitable for that use. At the same time, the departmental classification was found prima facie incorrect because Note 1(a) to Chapter 15 excluded pig fat, and the product was considered prima facie classifiable under Heading 05.01 as an animal-origin product not elsewhere specified, carrying nil duty. Waiver of pre-deposit of duty and penalty was therefore granted, and recovery was stayed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Aug 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104959</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>