https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104955 The court ruled in favor of the petitioner to a limited extent, directing the respondent-company to transfer the 360 shares within a specified timeframe. However, the petitioner was estopped from claiming voting rights for shares exceeding the limit set by Article 15 of the company's articles of association. The judgment aimed to balance shareholder rights with corporate governance concerns, maintaining the company's shareholding structure while providing the petitioner with relief under the Companies Act. en-us Fri, 01 Oct 1999 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 01 Mar 2012 18:32:52 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104955 The court ruled in favor of the petitioner to a limited extent, directing the respondent-company to transfer the 360 shares within a specified timeframe. However, the petitioner was estopped from claiming voting rights for shares exceeding the limit set by Article 15 of the company's articles of association. The judgment aimed to balance shareholder rights with corporate governance concerns, maintaining the company's shareholding structure while providing the petitioner with relief under the Companies Act. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 01 Oct 1999 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104955