<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (7) TMI 506 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104954</link>
    <description>Mere covering of contraband goods with otherwise lawful imported garments does not amount to concealment for confiscation under Section 119 of the Customs Act, 1962. The distinction between concealment and simple covering was applied, and the garments were found only to have been used to cover gas cylinders, not to hide them in the legal sense required by the provision. On that basis, confiscation of the garments was not sustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jul 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2012 18:28:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=141993" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (7) TMI 506 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104954</link>
      <description>Mere covering of contraband goods with otherwise lawful imported garments does not amount to concealment for confiscation under Section 119 of the Customs Act, 1962. The distinction between concealment and simple covering was applied, and the garments were found only to have been used to cover gas cylinders, not to hide them in the legal sense required by the provision. On that basis, confiscation of the garments was not sustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jul 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104954</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>