<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (9) TMI 838 - HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104952</link>
    <description>Amounts deducted from workers&#039; wages under a tripartite arrangement were treated as trust money held by the company only as custodian for remittance to the society. The deductions did not become part of the company&#039;s beneficial assets and could be followed in liquidation, giving the society a preferential claim. The existence of mortgages in favour of secured creditors and the liquidator&#039;s rights in the equity of redemption did not defeat that entitlement, because those rights extended only to the company&#039;s own assets and not to trust property. The liquidator was required to release the trust amount to the society before distributing liquidation proceeds.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2012 18:25:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=141991" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (9) TMI 838 - HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104952</link>
      <description>Amounts deducted from workers&#039; wages under a tripartite arrangement were treated as trust money held by the company only as custodian for remittance to the society. The deductions did not become part of the company&#039;s beneficial assets and could be followed in liquidation, giving the society a preferential claim. The existence of mortgages in favour of secured creditors and the liquidator&#039;s rights in the equity of redemption did not defeat that entitlement, because those rights extended only to the company&#039;s own assets and not to trust property. The liquidator was required to release the trust amount to the society before distributing liquidation proceeds.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104952</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>