<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (7) TMI 503 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104948</link>
    <description>Duty recovery cannot be pursued on a classification not proposed in the show cause notice; where the demand was confirmed under Heading 84.48 although the notice proposed Heading 40.16, the applicants established a strong prima facie case that the confirmed demand was not sustainable on that basis. Waiver of pre-deposit was therefore granted and recovery of the duty stayed pending disposal of the appeal. No final ruling was given on the merits of the classification dispute.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jul 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2012 18:22:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=141987" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (7) TMI 503 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104948</link>
      <description>Duty recovery cannot be pursued on a classification not proposed in the show cause notice; where the demand was confirmed under Heading 84.48 although the notice proposed Heading 40.16, the applicants established a strong prima facie case that the confirmed demand was not sustainable on that basis. Waiver of pre-deposit was therefore granted and recovery of the duty stayed pending disposal of the appeal. No final ruling was given on the merits of the classification dispute.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jul 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104948</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>