https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104940 A complaint under section 630 of the Companies Act, 1956 was treated as a criminal proceeding for territorial jurisdiction purposes, so the objection based on the company's registered office was rejected where the property and cause of action were said to arise at Saharanpur. The arbitration clause in the employment arrangement did not bar the complaint because it covered employment disputes, not the obligation to vacate the quarters, and criminal proceedings are not excluded by arbitration. The proceedings were also held not to be confined to a purely civil dispute, as the authority cited on that point was distinguished on its facts. en-us Tue, 21 Sep 1999 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 01 Mar 2012 18:14:36 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104940 A complaint under section 630 of the Companies Act, 1956 was treated as a criminal proceeding for territorial jurisdiction purposes, so the objection based on the company's registered office was rejected where the property and cause of action were said to arise at Saharanpur. The arbitration clause in the employment arrangement did not bar the complaint because it covered employment disputes, not the obligation to vacate the quarters, and criminal proceedings are not excluded by arbitration. The proceedings were also held not to be confined to a purely civil dispute, as the authority cited on that point was distinguished on its facts. Case-Laws Companies Law Tue, 21 Sep 1999 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104940