<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (12) TMI 714 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104931</link>
    <description>Serially numbered cash and credit memos under rule 3(66a) of the Bengal Sales Tax Rules, 1941 did not have to run in a continuous sequence for the entire year, because the rule did not prescribe any such period. Monthly restarting of the serial numbers still satisfied the requirement where the bills were in fact serially numbered. On that reading, the assessee could not be denied the exemption merely because a fresh serial began each month, and the exemption remained available.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Dec 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2012 17:58:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=141970" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (12) TMI 714 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104931</link>
      <description>Serially numbered cash and credit memos under rule 3(66a) of the Bengal Sales Tax Rules, 1941 did not have to run in a continuous sequence for the entire year, because the rule did not prescribe any such period. Monthly restarting of the serial numbers still satisfied the requirement where the bills were in fact serially numbered. On that reading, the assessee could not be denied the exemption merely because a fresh serial began each month, and the exemption remained available.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Dec 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104931</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>