<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (9) TMI 821 - HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH, INDORE BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104930</link>
    <description>The court held that the M.P. Stock Exchange is not considered a &#039;State&#039; under Article 12 of the Constitution. However, it is amenable to writ jurisdiction under Article 226 in situations where it performs public duties and obligations as outlined in the statutory framework. The appeals were partially allowed, leading to the revival of the dismissed writ petitions for further scrutiny based on the established legal position.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Sep 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2012 17:59:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=141969" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (9) TMI 821 - HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH, INDORE BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104930</link>
      <description>The court held that the M.P. Stock Exchange is not considered a &#039;State&#039; under Article 12 of the Constitution. However, it is amenable to writ jurisdiction under Article 226 in situations where it performs public duties and obligations as outlined in the statutory framework. The appeals were partially allowed, leading to the revival of the dismissed writ petitions for further scrutiny based on the established legal position.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Sep 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104930</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>